In the current regime of indirect tax system, the chain of input
credit, at a certain point, is broken. Let’s say Central Sales Tax (CST)
applicable on interstate trade is non-creditable, leading to a break in
the input credit chain. Similarly, a manufacturer charging excise duty
on sale to a dealer causes the chain to break. This leads to taxes forming a part of the product cost.
In the year 2005, VAT was introduced with the similar objective to
overcome cascading affect (tax on tax). If VAT was designed to eliminate
it, how is it different in GST?
Yes, VAT eliminated the cascading tax effect on the state indirect
tax, while the cascading effect of other indirect taxes still remained.
GST allows for seamless flow of tax credit, and eliminates the cascading
effect of all indirect taxes in the supply chain from manufacturers to
retailers, and across state borders.
Let us examine this with an example of car as a product with overall
rate of tax being considered @22% under existing and GST regime – to
illustrate elimination of tax on tax
Savings of 5,280 catching your eyes! Isn’t it? Let’s us examine this.
If you observe closely, in the example, the taxes paid by dealer
(CGST + SGST) to manufacturer is not added to cost. This is because GST
allows the dealer to set off the tax liability of CGST+SGST. This is one
of the fundamental features of GST, which allows seamless credit from
manufacturer to dealer, and eliminates the cascading effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment